“I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how” – Josef Stalin
Excerpted from the November 6th release of the World Affairs Brief, a recommended source on this blog:
TRUMP VICTORY STOLEN BY MASSIVE VOTE FRAUD
It is now certain that it wasn’t just a slip of the tongue when Joe Biden declared, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.” I think that’s one of the original reasons for exaggerating this pandemic was to increase the use of mail-in ballots because they are more subject to fraud. At first, it appeared as if my worst fears about Democrats stealing the election might not be able to overwhelm the strong pro-Trump response the initial returns were showing. Not only was the predicted Blue Wave of Democratic votes not happening, but Trump was winning handily all the swing states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Trump won Florida and Ohio, and then even Georgia and North Carolina were trending toward Trump. It appeared that the American people had truly awakened to the danger of the radical Democrat agenda and turned out in record numbers to vote against it. But then the manipulation started. Impossible surges of huge numbers of votes for Biden (with none for Trump) pushed Biden to the lead in Wisconsin and Michigan, and even Trump’s lead in Pennsylvania was rapidly dwindling from the same ballot stuffing fraud. Small amounts of voter fraud had been going on all night in Arizona and other tight states, but nothing like this massive fraud. This week, we will talk about how much we know so far of this brazen theft of a democratic election.
What happened Tuesday night and into Wednesday explains why the media was putting out a series of claims weeks before the election that it would take days or weeks to count the votes but only in certain swing states. Now we know they were preparing everyone to accept what they knew was coming—delayed counting giving time to produce more votes until their side won the election. Tucker Carlson blasted the media and the polls for manipulating the idea that Biden would win by a wide margin. There was no margin of victory. They had to steal it.
Here are the four propaganda items that were constantly paraded before the public leading up to the election:
1. What would happen if Trump failed to accept the results of the election?
2. Trump will appear to be winning at first, but then Biden would come from behind and win.
3. Democrats vote early more than Republicans and those ballots wouldn’t be counted until last because the most recent votes are counted first.
4. There will be long delays. Certain states (which turned out to be key swing states) will have trouble counting their ballots in big urban areas (where Democrats dominate) and will need several days to complete.
Looking at each point in turn. In excuse 1, why would Trump refuse to accept the results if they were clearly fair? They knew they weren’t going to be fair and thus primed the public to blame Trump for doing what they predicted: being a “sore loser.”
Excuse 2 was to diminish the surprise ending to the night. Small vote fraud wouldn’t be visible at first and the first two-thirds of returns would be within 5% of what was real. They knew the real dirty tricks wouldn’t kick in until the end when manipulators determined when and how much they would need to intervene in states where they were prepared to do so. This would be done in states where the machinery of corruption is in place, and where election leaders will allow falsified ballot insertions to happen.
Excuse 3 was to prime the public to accept a surge of ballots at the end, when all those mail-in advance voting ballots would be counted. Why was there a rule against counting them the day before the election? Election officials could certainly have kept the interim results private. But, no, they wanted an excuse to have delays at the end of the day where massive voter fraud would more easily go undetected, and when in the wee hours of the morning there may be less scrutiny from poll watchers.
In fact, the Trump administration sued to stop the vote counting in Michigan because poll watchers were denied access in certain areas and at certain times. Trump supporters chanted for hours at a Detroit counting station, “Stop the Count.” While vote fraud can still happen while poll watchers are present, it is more difficult.
For example, poll watchers only see the opening and processing of ballots. They aren’t allowed on the loading dock of a facility where ballots may arrive from either the Post Office or a questionable unmarked vehicle in the wee hours of the morning. That’s where mass produced printed and filled out ballots are introduced.
Why would anyone predict a surge for Democrats at the end? In 2016, the last ballots were in favor of Trump and a Republican win. This was no proper justification for this excuse, except to prepare people for the lie.
Excuse 4 gave manipulators time to work the results their way. The long delays that we are experiencing allow time to produce and conceal fake ballots at the end.
In fact, there is no reason why big cities can’t be reporting voter results in increments as quickly as smaller towns. Big cities have many more personnel and the results should be fairly uniform both early on and later in the day—as they work through the stockpile. The volume will be different but if big cities report hourly results, it would allow the gradual state-wide tabulation to be more stable.
But they don’t want stable trends or results—they want to have an excuse to see surges which is the perfect opportunity to hide illegal ballot drops. But leaving big blocks of votes to report by delay is suspicious of fraud.
Several swing states used one excuse or another to stop counting ballots on election night for the first time ever that I recall. Then when they would restart counting, large batches of votes (mostly for Biden) would appear, tipping the race towards the Democrats.
In Texas, one lawyer observed a person without a badge or credentials bring in a heavy white box (using a wagon) into the counting area early in the morning hours after all polling stations had closed and all ballots delivered. What was in the box? As reported by the Gateway Pundit:
A poll watcher filmed highly suspicious activity at a vote-counting center in Detroit at 4 a.m., the morning after election day. In the footage, taken by Kellye SoRelle, a Texas lawyer and member of Lawyers for Trump, a person in a white van was filmed loading up a red wagon outside the ballot counting location and bringing it [inside.]
SoRelle released the video to Texas Scorecard, because she wanted to raise “alarms that the box may have been a ballot box that arrived long after all ballots were expected to have been received at the counting facility.”
He also observed rolling suitcases and coolers moving in and out of the secure area where mail-in ballots were being counted during a shift change at 4 a.m.” Their report continues on to say that “according to SoRelle, visitors were able to enter and leave the facility where the votes are being counted without any identification check. The workers were apparently working in six-hour shifts, meaning they did not have a need for overnight luggage.”
Revolver News had a recap and analysis of this strategy that mirrored exactly what I was feeling as this played out Tuesday evening into Wednesday:
The margins in the decisive states are [were] clear. As of early Wednesday morning, the president was up 300,000 votes in Michigan. He was up 110,000 in Wisconsin. He was up a staggering 700,000 in Pennsylvania. He holds clear leads in Georgia and North Carolina.
The mess in Pennsylvania shows how this revolution [against Trump] will unfold. The president’s lead there is a staggering 14 percentage points. From the early hours of Tuesday night it was clear the President was dramatically overperforming his polls in the Keystone State, and as votes poured in his lead only grew and grew. But Democrats control Philadelphia and the state government, and they had a plan. Early Tuesday night, they stopped updating vote totals in Philadelphia and announced that they would only resume updates on Wednesday, with counting perhaps taking until Friday.
All to give time for them to execute the vote fraud
This is a farce. It does not take four days to count ballots anywhere; it doesn’t even take more than one night. Philadelphia and every other Democratic city could absolutely have counted every vote in its possession on Tuesday night. The only reason to delay the tally is to [muddy] the waters and provide Democrats with the necessary time to “find” the votes they need to win. Philadelphia is the exact city to do it in. The city already has a proven record of voter fraud:
Even National Review isn’t fooled by this behavior. On Tuesday night, the magazine laid out the sinister nature of the Democratic gambit in Pennsylvania:
The narrative that the Supreme Court has already authorized voting that does not comply with state election laws is just part one in a two-step scheme to enable post-election cheating: First, infiltrate as many illegal ballots as possible into the state systems; second, keep chanting that “every vote counts” and demagogue anyone who says otherwise — i.e., anyone who insists that state statutory law be followed — as “suppressing” votes, [is] no doubt motivated by racism.
The same stunt is happening around the country, in the deep blue cities of America’s swing states. Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, all of them have slow-rolled or outright ceased counting votes, for no reason except to drag out the process and create the friction needed to add questionable votes. This isn’t complicated. It’s an effort to snatch an election they know they are on the brink of losing.
But when observers called out the shady behavior right in front of their eyes, Big Tech swooped in to suppress the narrative: It’s no mystery what is happening here. Remarkably, most Republicans in the past would go along with it.
This battle will be the fiercest political fight in living memory. Every institution in America is arrayed against the president. Big Tech will try to silence his every word. Democratic state officials will collude with efforts to “find” ballots and count mail-in votes with no postmark or signature. The media will attack the President’s every word while giving Biden endless deference.
Even Fox News did its part on Tuesday night to undermine the president. All night, the network avoided calling states for Trump, even when the race was clearly over in states like Texas and Florida. But with Arizona, the network almost instantly called the race, even though huge amounts of election-day votes were outstanding (and could yet flip the state to Trump).
Their eagerness makes complete sense once one learns that Fox’s election guru is avid Democratic donor Arnon Mishkin. Mishkin has given more than $4500 to Democrats over the years, and on Tuesday night could be seen fanatically defending his decision to declare Arizona unwinnable for Trump, even as he dragged out calling states like Texas. The effort was clear: Even with President Trump leading in the key states, this strategy allowed election night to be treated as a “tie” or narrow Biden win, setting the stage for Biden to win as new votes are found in the coming days.
Cable news, the press, the colleges, big tech, the bureaucracy, the intelligence agencies: All of them spent four years trying to bring down the Trump presidency. The days to come are the climax of that effort.
One of these untimely ballot drops appeared so outrageous and clearly fraudulent that is seemed to be the big break we needed to prove fraud. The Michigan count where Trump was maintaining a steady 4 point lead, all of a sudden showed an increase in Biden votes of 128k at Decision Desk HQ, a private vote tabulating source that other news outlets rely on. Suspiciously, there were no recorded votes for Trump in this load of data.
The news quickly spread among conservatives and a tweet by a Texas county GOP chairman went viral about the fraud, and the tweet got picked up and repeated by President Trump. It took Decision Desk HQ several hours to get around to correcting the charge, claiming that it was a typographical error. Decision HQ said,
The data from Mackowiak’s second map showing Biden receiving 100% of the newly counted votes was released at 5:04 a.m. by Decision Desk HQ which showed Biden with 2,130,695 votes at Trump with 2,200,902 votes.
They didn’t say whether it was an error on the part of Shiawassee County, MI or at their end, but it is still a bit suspicious that any data dump from a rural county in Michigan would contain no votes for Trump. Was the denial by Decision HQ simply a coverup for the fraud?
I could very well be a coverup. Here’s video of a poll watcher in Detroit who says she and others saw 4 trucks drive up about 4 AM and unload about 130K ballots—long after the deadline for ballots to arrive through normal channels to be counted. Big League Politics noted,
“tens of thousands of absentee ballots arrived in large U.S. Postal Service boxes at the TCF Center in Detroit, Mich. on Wednesday morning at 3:30 am. The TCF Center, formerly Cobo Hall, is where the absentee ballots are counted for Wayne County, which is the home of Detroit.” Former Michigan state senator Patrick Colbeck wrote that the total number of ballots dumped on the counting board totaled 38,000
Even if this first example of the128K Biden votes was an error, it would have only been an error in the volume of votes they mistakenly posted and not that no Trump votes were added to make it look plausible. They won’t make either of those mistakes again. They had to debunk it because it was so obvious—but it didn’t make any difference, since lots of other false votes for Biden were being added in the early morning hours along with a small amount for Trump to boost Biden into the lead, as I just detailed above. The Daily Caller agrees:
Elections officials in Michigan and Wisconsin refused to explain Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s sudden and dramatic vote tally increase that occurred in both states Wednesday morning.
Another problem to overcome in falsifying mail-in ballots is the need to show a postmark. That can be easily overcome by machine stamping everything with a mark, knowing that election workers never take time to read the date on it. But just in case, in Michigan at least one post office in Traverse, MI was told to back date ballots to the third so they would qualify under the time deadline.
The Barcode Issue:
It is not difficult to print up duplicate ballots and have them computer marked and then dropped off to be processed. But Michigan and other states use a barcode to match each ballot with a registered voter. Won’t that stop this kind of fraud?
Under normal, honest computing yes. But election computers are known to have been programmed before to alter results and flip votes for the Democratic candidate. It was observed in several localities when Trump ran in 2016. The software to do so can easily be programmed to erase itself at a certain time or trigger event, like an audit.
A tabulating computer can also easily be programmed to read a falsified bar code to accept it even if not tied to a registered voter and not reject the ballot. The software between the BMD (Ballot Marking Device) used by voters and the tabulation computer is completely hidden and never transparent, as this computer blogger, Kevin Skogland, wrote:
I would argue that using barcodes to transfer vote selections from a BMD to a tabulator is not allowed under the VVSG 2.0 Principles.[Voluntary Voting System Guidelines principles]
* Barcodes are not transparent (Principle 3). They are an opaque, secret message being passed between the BMD and the tabulator. They are not a process or transaction which is “readily available for inspection,” (3.2) and the public cannot “understand and verify the operations” (3.3).
* Most current barcodes are in a proprietary format. That means they are not exporting data (from the BMD) and importing data (to the tabulator) “in an interoperable format” (4.1) or in a “standard, publicly-available” format (4.2).
* Voters cannot read barcodes so they cannot “understand all information as it is presented” (7.3).
His objections to Barcodes as a safety device continue:
* Barcodes do not “provide individual voters the opportunity to verify that the voting system correctly interpreted their ballot selections” (9.1-B.1), and the voter does not “have the opportunity to identify ballot errors before it is cast” (9.1-F.4). Voters can verify the human-readable version, but that is not the data being cast. Any malfunction or manipulation in the barcode data would not be detectable by the voter. It most likely would not be detectable without using proprietary hardware.
* There is a danger that barcodes would be used during recounts and audits. It is easier, faster, and cheaper to scan ballots again than to do a hand count or a proper audit. (Recently, a vendor demonstrated to me how to use a central-count tabulator to recount precinct-count ballots with barcodes
The fact that voting machines were programmed to flip votes for Hillary when people voted for Trump in certain districts in 2016 proves that bad actors have controlled voting computers in the past. This is not fake news. I documented in the WAB in November of 2016 the eyewitness accounts of those who say the machine changed their votes as they watched the screen, and election officials could get the machine to do it right.
I am sure they are more sophisticated now so that changing a person’s vote doesn’t show up on the screen. Lt Gen. Tom McInerny (Ret) gave an interview with Dave Jandy on two voter manipulation software suites the Deep State got from the CIA, called Operations Hammer and Scorecard. His interview got banned by Youtube, but not on the link above. Skip the intro in the link above and go to minute 7 to start.
Gen. McInerny is not a plant in the movement. He correctly assessed that Obama was not eligible to be president, and that Sen. John McCain had succumbed to torture in Vietnam (why the others called him “songbird”). He used to be a regular guest on Fox News on military issues, but after his remarks against McCain he was banned from Fox—a badge of honor, indeed.
He tells Janda that the Democrats have been colluding with the CIA to launch intelligence operation that alter voting machine results. He doesn’t seem to be up to speed about the Deep State, which actually does these things on behalf of the Democrats, but he wouldn’t know these code names if he didn’t have access to some high level operations, after retiring. Here is part of the transcript of what he says in the interview:
This covert technology is called Operation Scorecard, and it was built by the CIA to surreptitiously steal elections in targeted countries. Now that technology is being turned against the United States of America and is about to be activated on Tuesday to steal the election for Biden, explains Janda’s guest.
As McInerney explains in the video, after the closing of polls in Pennsylvania and other swing states, the voting machines will be intercepted and then altered using complex algorithms to alter the votes in a way that evades detection, handing a victory to the pre-designated “winner” (Joe Biden).
In the interview, he explains that a covert app called “Scorecard” steals votes by making sure Democrats always stay about 3% ahead of their Republican rivals. “Scorecard steals the elections by tampering with the computers at the transfer points,” he adds.
He may know about these two secret election manipulation programs, but I don’t think he really knows how they operate. Scorecard did not obviously keep Biden ahead of Trump by 3% during the entire process. I’m sure they were programmed to do it late in the game as we observed.
So, why worry about adding falsified ballots, or “harvesting ballots” as paid agents for Rep. Illian Omar were caught doing by Operation Veritas, if the computers can do it all? Gen. McInerney explained that the intervention in computers didn’t fully operate in 2016, and that’s why altering physical ballots may still be in play, as a backup.
It is also not a unified, controlled-from-the-top conspiracy. Local Democratic machine politics are used to doing their own vote manipulation, and it is safer to have a conspiracy decentralized so that a single whistleblower can’t expose higher level direction. Here is a sampling of reports I have received.
Summit News commented on the evidence that voter turnout is statistically way too high compared to all former years, indicating votes are being added by fraud:
Trump supporters are questioning the record 89% turnout figure in Wisconsin, which represents a 22% increase on the amount of people who voted in 2016. President Trump was ahead in Wisconsin for most of last night, before massive vote dumps at around 4am suddenly turned the state blue, leading many to allege vote fraud.
Official figures put the turnout in the state at over 89%, which represents a new record and a phenomenal increase compared to recent presidential elections, including 2016 when voter turnout was 67%.
Numerous wards in Milwaukee also reported more votes in the presidential election than there were registered voters. Trump supporters say the activity in Wisconsin is highly suspicious and are calling for an investigation. “They’re stealing this!” remarked Harlan Hill.
Commentator Bill Mitchell also pointed to suspiciously high turnouts in other states. “Along with Michigan, Pennsylvania also had 80% turnout. These numbers are just preposterous. And it’s all due to the fake absentee ballots,” he said.
Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit reported on the 23,277 votes found in Philly — all of them for Biden. So what happened in Wisconsin and Michigan is now happening in PA, which will put Biden over the 270 electoral votes to win. Trump’s lead of 6 points in PA has been narrowed to less than 1 point. As Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro boasted,
“Donald Trump can no longer win the state because of unprecedented measures Democrats have put into place to sway the election.”
“If all the votes are added up in PA, Trump is going to lose. That’s why he’s working overtime to subtract as many votes as possible from this process,” Shapiro wrote in a tweet.
And, as The Duran wrote, a poll watcher in PA said “You don’t want the vote to [be decided in] Pennsylvania, it is a mess, it is an absolute mess.” But that’s exactly where its happening. Bigleaguepolitics.com reported,
Michigan state representative Shane Hernandez initially discovered that a precinct in the small town of Marysville had a voter turnout that was roughly 35 percent lower than neighboring precincts.
St. Clair County Clerk Jay DeBoyer performed an investigation as a result of Hernandez’s findings, and he discovered that the absentee ballots in the precinct were not counted because of a mistake that was made in the clerk’s office. After the mistake was corrected, Trump gained an additional 500 votes. [There never any admission of purposeful mistakes.]
This is far from the only instance of a voter irregularity that has occurred in the conservative rural areas throughout Michigan. There have also been abnormalities reported in Antrim County, a county in the ultra-conservative northern part of the state. Antrim initially went for Biden by a 2-to-1 margin, [an impossibility in that part of the state] but those results are now being reviewed and are expected to be corrected.
Sadly, they only get corrected if caught. I covered the report of Detroit workers being coached on how to implement fraud.
The Sharpie Pen controversy:
Various states report voters having ballots rejected because they were given Sharpie brand markers or felt pens at the polls to mark their ballots. Felt pens bleed through to the other side and can get a ballot reject. Some complained that the computer scanner couldn’t read the sharpie. Here is a video of a voter in AZ who documented the ballots marked with Sharpies being rejected, while ballpoint pens ballots were accepted and read. Arizona denies this, but complaints persist, as this Penvibe blog wrote:
For example, there was a kerfuffle in the American state of New Mexico [and Arizona, and Maine] recently when state officials declared the Sharpie unfit for voting booths (Update: They didn’t declare it unfit, but acknowledged there had been complaints.) While they stopped just short of banning the markers all together, they did order nearly 900 boxes of Paper Mate Flair felt-tip pens and shipped them to polling places as replacements.
The problem was that Sharpies were bleeding through the paper ballots.
It’s not the first time Sharpies have been trouble at the polls. In 2013, voters complained when the Sharpies they were given bled through their double-sided ballots in an election in New York. And in 2004, Sharpies were blamed for a miscount in Maricopa County, Arizona (although an expert later opined that voting machines were able to read Sharpies just fine, but could not read Bic ballpoint).
So bad were the number of voters whose ballots were invalidated after using election provide Sharpies, that they have filed a class action lawsuit. In any case, the disputes only tend to happen in Republican areas.
Mark Levin covered the Pennsylvania violations of the rules on ballot postmarks and Wisconsin irregularities tabulating more votes than registered voters:
The Democrats have been litigating in various states for months to change election laws to favor Joe Biden and Democrat candidates. The Pennsylvania Secretary of State fundamentally altered her guidance and was asked to resign by Republicans. She changed the rules for ballots after telling the state Supreme Court she’d separate any ballots received after 8 pm on election day. She then co-mingled those ballots defying, undermining, re-writing the existing election statutes that she told the court agreed to uphold.
Then, Kimberly Strassel from the Wall Street Journal editorial board calls in to explain something strange that happened in Wisconsin’s election results from last night and today. Wisconsin has same-day voter registration. With turnout at 71%, Wisconsin would have needed 900k same-day registrations yesterday to reach the numbers being reported. Later, delays in counting votes occurred like never before as the Democrats waited for mail-in votes to arrive. Some states have extra days, why don’t all states have extra days?
North American Law Center reported:
Pennsylvania election laws require a photo ID for any first time voter in the registry, because without that, there is no way to know who is voting and whether or not they are eligible to vote. Every election Judge and Inspector had to sign an affidavit which requires them to offer only a provisional ballot to people trying to vote without any identification. The voter registries states ID REQUIRED next to the name of these voters, before they can be placed on a machine to vote…
At around 6:00 PM ET in Steubenville, Allegheny County PA, Allegheny Country Election Commission official David Voe ordered election judges to allow everyone to vote without any ID. Voe threatened to arrest anyone who did not follow that order and shortly thereafter, Allegheny County Sheriff Frank Baker sent two Deputies, Clark and Walsh, to arrest two election workers. They were treated like criminals and hauled before Judge Jack McVay, Jr. where they were told that the law doesn’t matter, the constitutional doesn’t matter, their oaths do not matter and charged with contempt!
Then there was the duplicate voting fraud that was allowed in Michigan and Wisconsin. Ineligible voters with no ID are still being allowed to vote. Family friend and DC pundit Mark Hemingway tweeted about the corruption in Philadelphia,
There were two indictments for voter fraud in Philly earlier this year involving a Democratic election judge and a former Democratic congressman. I would be watching these ballots if I were GOP.
A Nevada Postal carrier was caught on video by Project Veritas pledging vote fraud to remove Trump. A volunteer at a counting facility in Michigan claims there was at least one box of 500 Ballots from people not on voter rolls.
One video posted by Will Chamberlain of Human Events shows a poll watcher being kept out of the polling place where he was trying to verify accountability and transparency in the voting process. The Philadelphia Republican Party reported that poll watchers are being evicted from several voting precincts throughout the city, as the Democrats run their crooked election day operations.
Summary:
The bottom line is that Pennsylvania will continue the false vote harvesting until Biden wins there too. Biden is already talking about choosing his transition team. But it won’t be a total disaster since Republicans have picked up seats in the House and will retain control of the Senate. Only the Senate can now block the Democrat’s radical agenda. Biden won’t be able to pack the Supreme Court or create two additional states (DC and Puerto Rico) to increase the Democrat roster of Senators. Mitch McConnell is a globalist, but he probably won’t dare attempt an open betrayal of the Trump legacy. Major news services are now officially calling the election for Biden. Trump will continue to fight legally, but it’s over.
Trump, now expecting to lose by fraud, will begin to run his second term early in the months left, starting by firing Fauci, FBI Director Wray, and Defense Secretary Esper. He also needs to fire AG Barr for failing to prosecute any in the Deep State. Any replacement, even if honest (which is doubtful) would have no time in office to do anything.
More evidence is detailed and analyzed in the following excerpt from the November 13th, 2020 release of the World Affairs Brief:
2020 VOTE FRAUD: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE
Despite an avalanche of evidence showing voter fraud in every key swing state this week, the mainstream media crowned Biden “president elect” on Saturday. Biden spoke to a moderately-sized crowd of supporters in cars declaring himself the winner of the largest vote total in history and the president who will “unify the nation” while proclaiming that there is absolutely no evidence of election meddling. This week Trump began making his case for vote fraud as the evidence poured in. In every case Trump’s claims were met with derision by the media who quickly added the universal disclaimer that it was “without evidence.” Even false-conservative Fox News interrupted the broadcast of a White House briefing on fraud to declare “we don’t have any evidence of this.” The Trump team’s legal filing contains over a hundred pages of affidavits, and evidence pointing to fraud including witnesses who saw boxes of ballots being delivered by unmarked vehicles in the middle of the night through doors with no security, and scientific analysis of the votes tallies showing manipulation. But the mainstream media will have none of it. The only time they report about voter fraud is when it is being debunked or “fact checked” even when more credible information is constantly being revealed. The unofficial censorship on both television, radio news, and social media is so strong and uniformly in lock-step with government officials that most Americans don’t even realize how their minds are being molded into a uniform public opinion.
Are we to believe that Joe Biden, whose lack of charisma that couldn’t bring out a crowd of more than a hundred during the campaign, tallied the highest number of votes for president in US history? Are we to believe that Biden defeated president Trump while Democrats lost seats in the US House of Representatives? It is highly improbable.
Significant vote fraud has been detected in 8 states—all swing states crucial to Biden’s false election victory: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Virginia (the 4 states where the bulk of the vote fraud happened) and in Georgia, Arizona and Nevada where margins where small enough that relatively minor fraud could make a difference. This week I’ll cover each type of vote fraud with analysis in the following categories:
• Vote Flipping and Eliminating votes
• Vote Buying
• Ballot Stuffing (Adding votes)
• False Registrations
• Illegal Vote Handling Procedures
• Hiring the Fox to Guard the Henhouse
• Postdating ballots
Vote Flipping
2016: Vote flipping was a real problem for Donald Trump in 2016 when voters made their choices at the polls on computerized machines with touch screens, where people could see the error in front of them. They did, and they complained loudly. Election officials kept saying it was a computer glich, but that’s never possible. Computer bugs happen the same way every time, and these sophisticated algorithms were only flipping votes a small percentage of the time, hoping it wouldn’t be noticed. That takes sophisticated programming. That small amount of vote fraud turned out not to be enough to defeat Trump in 2016. I’m sure the Deep State vowed not to make the same mistake in 2020.
The vote stealing Deep State gets better at fraud over time, as we shall see. The false Covid Pandemic allowed a massive switch over to paper ballots, and forced the fraudsters to start doing vote flipping at the tabulation computer level where it was supposed to be invisible.
2018: They began doing this in the 2018 midterm election, and because these vote tabulation sites were feeding data to the major networks in real time, you could sometimes see the vote flipping on the screen when the slice of data was small enough to show a decrease in the votes to the Republican candidate. Vote totals are not supposed to ever decrease during a computer count, and it is statistically impossible for them to decrease for the Republican by the exact same amount they increase for the Democrat.
This is exactly what happened in the 2018 election for governor of Kentucky where incumbent Republican governor Matt Bevin “lost” to Democrat Andy Beshears. In this video link, (go forward to 1:20 min to avoid the wordy intro) you will see a perfect case of tabulation computer vote flipping, done by one of the private aggregator of voting data, Clarity, as they fed data to CNN’s election coverage. The analysis is by Russell Rasland of Allied Security Operations, and I will cover his other grounding breaking analysis of 2018 election computer logs later in the brief.
The vote manipulation happened in a split second, but Rasland slows down the video frame by frame so you can see that at the same instant Beshears has 560 votes added to his total, 560 votes are subtracted from Bevin. It wouldn’t have been visible at other data uploads if they had intermingled the number of votes flipped with other totals which would mask the vote flipping. But in this unique case, the computer issued the flipped data before operators could add other votes to it so that it wouldn’t be so obvious.
Allied Security also found that every time there were Republican straight ticket undercounts in Kentucky (they didn’t vote for governor), those votes were awarded to Beshear.
It is powerful evidence of vote flipping whenever computer tabulated votes are subtracted from a candidate, and it is proof when that same number of votes is added to the opposition candidate. If put on the spot in court, the people at Clarity would probably say that there was a tabulation error, which they had to correct, but computers don’t make these kinds of errors. And, even if they did, humans wouldn’t realize it unless doing a manual recount—which never happens in the middle of a computer run tabulating thousands of votes. This is human intervention.
2020: Vote Flipping happened thousands of times in 2020, ranging from a few to over 5,000 at a time, especially in states where the election computers were controlled by Dominion Voting Systems, which controls voting software and hardware in 28 states, including all of the disputed swing states.
Here is a glaring example in Wisconsin [Distributed News]:
In Rock County, Trump was ahead of Joe Biden by 9,516 votes, capturing 46,649 votes to Joe Biden’s 37,133 votes with 100 percent of the precincts reporting. Then the numbers switched and Biden suddenly had Trump’s 46,649 votes, leaving Trump with Biden’s 37,133 votes. The vote tallies were evenly swapped with no deviation or explanation, and only the alt media seems to have taken notice of what happened
An analysis of the data from election night shows further vote manipulation. A computer scientist who goes by the pseudonym of “Centipede” downloaded the entire computer logs of Edison Data which many of the major TV networks as well as the NY Times rely upon. His entire analysis is completely transparent. He offers up the raw data for anyone to work with and even reveals the computer script he used to cull the data. He says
…the data shows serious irregularities and there should be a full investigation into the Dominion system to determine what really happened on election [night].” He even found a few instances when a “Switch did happen for Biden to Trump, as some of you have pointed out, and they also happened from 3rd party to (mainly Biden) both. The results should disturb everyone.”
He also emphasizes that when he tallied all the results, almost a million votes (mostly for Trump) were disappeared or removed from the count, but that, “This doesn’t take into account all the hundreds of thousands of Trump votes destroyed, burned and ripped apart, or the thousands of ballots just marked for Biden” (no other votes indicated for other races).
Here is a summary of how many votes Dominion switched to Biden from Trump and how many total votes disappeared from the tallies (lost) in disputed states. As a control, he also lists in the above link the other states, many of which had zero switches and zero lost votes.
Take special note of the numbers in bold letters—that’s where the big fraud occurred. Notice also that the switching of votes to Biden did not account for all the votes lost for Trump. Many were simply made to disappear in the count.
• Pennsylvania: Switched: 220,883 Lost Votes: 941,248
• New Jersey : Switched: 80,242 Lost Votes: 20
• Florida: Switched: 21,422 Lost Votes: 456
• Michigan: Switched: 20,213 Lost Votes: 21,882 [total of 41k lost to Trump]
• New York: Switched: 18,124 Lost Votes: 623,213
• Georgia: Switched: 17,407 Lost Votes: 33,574
• Ohio: Switched: 14,965 Lost Votes: 5,102
• Virginia: Switched: 12,163 Lost Votes: 789,023
• Arizona: Switched: 4,492 Lost Votes: 0
Georgia and Arizona are still tightly contested, so the relatively small number of votes switched and/or lost will have a big impact. I have highlighted Virginia because the media does not consider it a disputed state. They were calling it for Biden even when Trump had a large lead, but the evidence of adding votes for Biden and making Trump votes disappear is strong. I will cover Virginia more closely in the analysis of early voting mail-in ballots below.
What triggered this detailed analysis was a couple of articles in the GatewayPundit.com which highlighted a switch in votes from Trump to Biden, first in Antrim County and then in Oakland County, MI. Being heavy Republican areas, the numbers were challenged by Republican leaders and county election officials were forced to give 6,000 votes back to Trump.
The above computer scientist found the Antrim County data and shows that the fraud wasn’t just for Biden. Some of Trump’s votes were given to a Libertarian running on the ballot. It had the same effect of denying votes to trump but would be harder to claim fraud for Biden. He wrote,
I went looking through the data I got from my script, trying to find if the moment the Antrim glitch happened in Michigan is there. And here is the specific part when the switch happened. You can see in that picture, that Trump lost 3,096 votes, those all went to Biden. BUT, Trump also lost 2,324 votes, that went to Jo Jorgensen. (Libertarian candidate)
In the same above by the Gateway Pundit Jim Hoft documented that in Wisconsin at 11:43 “more votes came in and they showed Trump had taken a commanding lead at 46,649 to Biden’s 37,133. This was a 9,516 vote lead for Trump. But then suddenly at 11:57 these votes had swapped. Biden was reported with 46,649 and Trump was reduced to Biden’s former total of 37,133. These votes had swapped from the President Trump to Biden – again a swap from a Republican to a Democrat. The net impact was 19,032 votes.”
President Trump’s team is busy analyzing computer election logs, which are a goldmine of information about voting irregularities. He tweeted,
“Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide. Data analysis finds 221,000 Pennsylvania votes switched from president Trump to Biden. 941,000 votes were deleted.”
The White House must be accessing the same data that “Centipede” got a hold of, because the figures correlate. The judges hearing these cases are going to have a hard time not seeing election fraud. Even if you consider “Centipede’s” analysis which does include irregularities in favor of Biden, the election results clearly are too flawed to certify.
Vote Buying
The Blaze reported that, “Multiple Somali-Americans living in Minneapolis-St. Paul have come forward to describe vote-buying, ballot-harvesting, and intimidation operations of historic scope in the Democratic Party-controlled area. Some have brought evidence to state and federal law enforcement, though little action has been taken. These whistleblowers explicitly name Rep. Ilhan Omar, her campaign director Ali Isse, and other Democratic Party members as being involved.” James O’Keefe even filmed one of the vote buyers bragging about getting paid $500/vote.
Ballot Stuffing
The Biden campaign has made much out of the claim that Biden received the highest number of votes for president in history (70M+), but no one is even trying to explain the incredibly high turnout of Democrats that only happened in key swing states. This is more evidence of ballot stuffing, as witnessed in this video by a ballot observer in Detroit who described three vehicles including a van dropping off a total of 61 boxes of ballots at 4 AM in the morning.
In Wisconsin, the numbers of unexpected votes was so high, it exceeded the number of registered voters by almost a million people. Wisconsin does have same day registration, but an audit will show that either most of those new registrations don’t exist or they have been falsified with names of people that are either fictitious, dead or who did not actually register.
Election computer logs are different than the tabulation computer logs that were used in Centipede’s analysis. Election logs can be analyzed for how many times data was added, or when error messages where thrown when votes being added exceeded the number of ballots cast. They can tell you who had access to the data and how many times a flash drive was inserted to add, or change data or programming.
As I mentioned earlier, Allied Security Operations got a chance to do a detailed forensic analysis of the Dallas county election computer data when someone leaked the logs to them. In this video link, you can watch the entire interview with CD Media’s L.Todd Wood and Allied’s owner/partner Russell Ramsland. Here is my summary of the story:
They got involved in election security in 2018 when the “blue wave” was happening and Beto O’Roarke almost won against Ted Cruz. Rasland says that in 2002 Congress passed the HAVA act, which allowed private contractors to be hired with federal money to run voting software. These companies do it with no transparency or supervision.
The entire election process from BMD (Ballot Marking Devices), tabulation computers, and reporting of results goes through private companies, some of which handle voting in other countries as well. All of these systems and equipment are internet connected, and the claim of an “air gap” is a myth.
Some of these companies are foreign owned and have servers outside the US and these are the ones that control the “unofficial vote” but all the final “official results” come from these unofficial sites, so if the unofficial sites are manipulated, the official tally is tainted as well.
Allied explained that votes can be changed at the voting location, at the tabulation software level and in the actual database. Someone could even change the voting software itself because everything can be accessed via the internet—nothing is secure if you hack in or have the passwords.
The logs showed interventions all during the election counting cycle. For comparison, he put up a slide of Dallas logs compared to Bexar County in San Antonio, a democratic reliable county (which wouldn’t be subject to intervention against Republicans since it isn’t even a close race) Here is a summary of his comparison of the two:
1. The Dallas election computers cleared the audit data 6 times. Bexar cleared zero times.
2. Dallas Precincts had error messages that the votes registered exceeded ballots cast 1,027 times. Bexar had zero such errors. He said any number of extra ballots could have been added during each of these error message occurrences.
3. Dallas reset the entire Database twice, Bexar zero.
4. Dallas repeated “Collect Audit Data from Flash drive” 4 times. Bexar 1 time (messing with the Audits).
5. They found malware in the code which allows them to capture the log-in credentials of everyone logging into the system to change results.
6. They found instances in Dallas where data appeared to be uploading from outside the “election system.”
7. Their cyber team could get into election systems on location with just a cellphone. More aggressive reviews or intrusions of these systems show that these systems are connected to the internet (The claim of an “air gap” is a myth), multiple locations (in different states) share the same SSL certificate which Ramsland describes as akin to an entire neighborhood sharing the same front door key.
8. In analyzing the code, they found ways to change votes at the tabulation end and backload them into the original database to make them look as if they originated from ballot marking devices (BMDs)—thus defeating any computer recount.
If a computer recount is ordered, it won’t pick up the fraud. Only a manual recount, verifying each ballot against a registration signature will discover fraud. Allied points out that the Official Results can also be changed because they are behind the same firewall as the unofficial, subject to the same intervention as the Unofficial side of the database.
They found ways to change the voting machines, the Central Counting Tabulation software (both at lower levels and higher levels) and the database itself. There is much more in the video, and all explained in layman terms, including the evidence he found that Democrat operatives not only were receiving data from the system, but were inputting data back into the system!
Ramsland, importantly, points out that the voting software is full of security holes and none of them have been fixed since he compiled his report and sent it to the federal government years ago. For example, he says the election data for 28 U.S. states [Dominion] is stored on databases not on U.S. soil, but in servers in Europe, which we don’t know who controls it, That’s a total breach of security.
He also said he has attempted to go to the FBI to detail his firm’s findings regarding major security flaws and vulnerabilities of the election system, but they have done nothing. He tried working with DHS field level officials, but their similar findings were blocked from moving up to the Washington level of command.
Ramsland also attempted to get a meeting with the Cyber Intelligence Security Agency within DHS, but his team was only granted a phone call.
In an interesting comparison, in 2016 Allied Security found 3 states that stopped counting in the middle of the night and when they came back up they found huge numbers of votes for Democrats with no-votes for Republicans—a statistical impossibility.
Now let’s look at the claim that millions more came out and voted for Biden, but ONLY in the swing states. Trump’s only really good attorney, Sidney Powell said “We’ve identified 450,000 ballots that miraculously only have a vote for Joe Biden”
A Youtuber named “Palm Coast” does a detailed numbers analysis here. I will summarize how he shows the Biden increase in voting in the key swing states he won cannot be justified by growth or any other election comparison with prior years.
For control he picks a state like California that didn’t have to cheat because Democrats already dominated. He shows how between 2016 and 2020 California with a population of over 40M grew by 767K people, and the number of people voting increased during the same period by 850k or by about 2.3% (keep those numbers in mind 850k more voters out of 40 million)
In contrast, New York, another solid blue state that didn’t have to cheat, which only grew by about 100k people between 2016 and 2020, actually went down in percentage of voters by 4.3%
But in next door Pennsylvania, which had zero or negative growth in recent years (12.7M people), there was supposedly a whopping 6% growth in number of voters—787k, almost as many as in the much larger state of California, and greater than the previous 3 election cycles combined! PA’s average rate of voting growth was 1.5% in prior years.
In Michigan, with a population of 10M, and only 49K more people in the past four years, she claimed an increase of 8% , a whopping 899k more voters. How does an increase in 49k people translate into nearly 900K more voters, even more than California with over 4x the population base?
In Wisconsin, with only 5.8M people, and growth of 87k people, she claimed that 453k more people voted, an increase of 8% over the previous election. In 2016 numbers of voters were actually down 4%, so they came up 12%. Really?
In Nevada, with a population of 2.8 million (down from 3M), she claimed an increase in voters of 253K, an 8.5% increase as opposed to previous years increases of less than 2%. Impossible.
Georgia had an increase in population of about 300K from 2016 to 2020 but claimed an increase of 957k votes!
Arizona, a fast growing state with 7.4M people grew 459K people since 2016. They showed 856k more voting—not as outrageous as Michigan, but double the percentage of voter growth of neighboring California.
The foregoing is good statistical evidence of fraud, but only because this rate of voter growth shows up no where else in the country, only in these swing states. But it’s not conclusive. Now let’s take a look at some much more definitive proof of votes being added—the most logical explanation for abnormal growth of voters in the swing states that went for Biden after late night ballot dumps.
This, like the foregoing analysis is by someone who got a hold of the Edison data off the NY Times website. It may be the same guy “Centipede” but because the author “scraped” it from the NY Times he wishes to remain anonymous. But like “Centipede” before he gives you the raw data so others can check his results. Zerohedge published his findings, and they are spectacular. Read my explanation first and then go back to the link to see his charts.
What the data scientist focused on was the Mail-in ballots, which have one unique characteristic: as they make their way through the mail they get mixed in with other mail, get transported from one center to another and are finally sorted at the destination for delivery to election centers—where they sit for weeks awaiting election day to be opened and counted.
Why is that different from precinct voting? Precinct voting definitely shows differing political preferences. Urban areas are more Democrat leaning and rural more conservative—usually much more so. Thus, you can easily predict how ballot returns are going to land depending on the precinct they come from, but NOT Mail-in ballots.
They all get mailed at different times and places and are shuffled together and homogenized through the postal process. None are sorted by precinct. Thus, as the data scientist points out in virtually all the non swing states Mail-in ballots show a near constant, steady ratio of Democrat to Republican ballots, and it hardly varies during the entire count.
So, when you compare the charts of states with less election meddling to the critical swing states you can see signs of manipulation. In states where vote fraud is highly suspected, you see tabulated votes skewing upward showing significant jumps in the ratio favoring the Democrat that likely come from significant inputs of skewed ballots and it keeps going higher. It never comes down. This shouldn’t happen, and doesn’t in normal states. And there is never observed a jump toward a higher Republican ratio—only toward Biden.
In the graphs that he plots over time, you will see individual blue dots representing the results for different precincts as they come in. Go to the link and go about half way down to the second Florida graph which shows the horizontal line of blue dots.
The graph is divided in half—the top half for democratic leaning votes and the bottom half for Republican leaning votes. The steady line of blue dots that more or less follows left to right an imaginary line separating the Dems from the Republican votes, are the results from opening mail-in ballots. They are together in a line precisely because the ratio of Democrat votes to Republican isn’t supposed to change much. It actually starts a little higher for Democrats because rural votes arrive in the postal system a bit later. As he says,
The initial reporting represents in-person voting (random blue dots high and low on the left). These vote reports have such large variation because in-person voting happens across different geographic areas that have different political alignments. We can see this same pattern of noisy in-person voting, followed by homogeneous mail-in reporting in almost all cases. (The horizontal blue line of dots) What we see in almost all examples across the country is that the ratio of mail-in Dem to Rep ballots is very consistent across time, but with the notable drift from Dem to slightly more Rep [in Florida as the vote progresses].
The next graph is Minnesota, which has a similar steady horizontal line, except that it is higher on the graph representing the higher Democrat leanings of Minn.
The next graph is of Wisconsin, where at 4:06 in the morning we see a sudden jump in the ratio favoring Biden, and it never comes down. Around 3am Wisconsin time, a fresh batch of 169k new absentee ballots arrived. They were supposed to stop accepting new ballots, but they didn’t. As the author says,
[the anomaly] is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots.
Those ballots showed up as all Biden, and it shows on the graph at 4:06 when they post them. In the next graph of Pennsylvania, about the same time in the morning (when counting is supposedly shut down) new ballots arrive and by 4:30 am they begin to be posted and the Biden/Trump ratio starts to steadily rise, and keeps rising gradually as more are added gradually. There’s no sudden jump because they probably kept counting other legitimate ballots at the same time—but the ratio was affected.
In the next slide in Georgia, he writes, “In Georgia we see pretty much the same story as Pennsylvania: increasing fractions of mail-in Democrat ballots over time even though it defies logic and we see this pattern no where else in the country.”
In Georgia, voters were unable to cast machine ballots for a couple of hours in Morgan and Spalding counties after the electronic devices crashed. Election officials said that the companies “uploaded something last night, which is not normal, and it caused a glitch… That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election.”
In the next chart of Michigan we see both the sudden jump in the ratio at batch number 100, and then the gradual changing of the ratio toward Biden as illegal ballots are slowly introduced into the mix to mask ballot dumping.
The last chart shows Virginia where the highest level of fraud took place, which explains why all the networks knew to call it for Biden early and not add it to the disputed list. It should be disputed. You see in the chart numerous large jumps in the ratio for Biden, much higher than any other state. He summarizes by saying,
It appears Dems shot themselves in the foot bc making everyone do mail-in ballots actually makes it easier to catch mail-in ballot fraud. Bc all of the ballots go through the postal system, they get shuffled like a deck of cards, so we expect reported ballot return to be extremely UNIFORM in terms of D vs R ratio, but to drift slightly towards R over time bc some of those ballots travel farther. This pattern proves fraud and is a verifiable timestamp of when each fraudulent action occurred.
When confronted with this evidence the mainstream talking heads always call them “computer glitches”, to ensure no one thinks there was anything intentional. But technology experts like former NSA technical director and whistleblower William Binney says in this video, that these are not glitches.
A true glitch is a bug, and a bug does everything the same, even when it doesn’t work. It’s still consistent with everything. The only thing that can select and change things is designed into the software. That’s not a glitch. The upshot of it all is that one of president Trump’s attorneys, Rudy Giuliani says that they have whistleblowers from Dominion willing to testify to the company’s systematic vote fraud.
False or Improper Registration
In October, Judicial Watch released a comparison study of Census Bureau population statistics and state voter registration data to reveal a notable disparity. The study found that 352 U.S. counties in 29 states managed to have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible voting-age citizens.
But many registrations are of people who are not citizens and ineligible to vote. A common state tactic to get illegal aliens registered to vote is to automatically send out registration cards to all holders of drivers licenses. Or, as in Oregon, all drivers licenses are automatically registered to vote unless they opt out. That is a recipe for inviting millions of illegals to vote. It is called automatic voter registration and it is growing in use. In 2016 over a third of all voter registrations originated at the DMV.
Dead Voters: Another tactic is to get lists of obituaries in large cities and cast votes for them, knowing that they are already registered. President Trump tweeted out the names of several dead persons who voted in Pennsylvania and other contested states. Tucker Carlson revealed a list of 25 dead people he says voted in the Nevada election.
One person did a search on Georgia’s voter registration website and found 10K deceased or moved still on the rolls. A lawsuit in PA says, “Pennsylvania still left the names of more than 21,000 dead individuals on the voter rolls less than a month before one of the most consequential general elections for federal officeholders in many years,”
21 states allow same day registration when you vote. All they have to do is provide an ID and a utility bill showing a residential address. No citizenship test is allowed.
Illegal Vote Handling Procedures
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said late Tuesday that the Trump lawyers have 234 pages of what she said were sworn affidavits alleging election irregularities in one county in Michigan. I am sure they will get more as the investigation continues.
Several states, including Pennsylvania went to court to allow them to delay the time of voting and of counting votes—which is illegal. The courts cannot change voting rules—only the state legislature can.
Two observers in Detroit during the absentee ballot counting process have produced affidavits claiming they witnessed workers create new voter files with information obtained from ballots.
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe has been censored again by Twitter shortly after releasing a video of a whistleblower attesting to voter irregularities in Pennsylvania. The video pertains to spoiled ballots being [thrown into the garbage] by Pennsylvania elections workers against protocol. Pennsylvania Board of Elections Director Tom Freitag confirmed in the video that the law was not followed.
In another Video, a Pennsylvania another USPS whistleblower says he was told to dump all non-Biden ballots mailers after Nov. 9 and report them “undeliverable.” Another reported problems in Nevada:
Fox News reported on Saturday that a whistleblower in Nevada swore an affidavit declaring that he witnessed illegitimate processing of ballots as an election worker… the whistleblower claimed to have been instructed to count ballots needing signature verification that lacked the requisite signatures to be eligible. This also happened in Wisconsin. Because of this and other examples, the rate of rejected mail-in ballots is almost 30 times lower in Pennsylvania this year than in 2016.
A lawsuit in Michigan by the Great Lakes Justice Center, lists evidence to show that ballots were processed in Detroit and Wayne County that had not been properly validated. It also says voters who had already voted absentee or mail-in were voting a second time with the help of corrupt poll workers. Larsen says he personally observed election officials changing names on ballots when counting machines identified that some people had already voted.
Voting rules also require that poll watchers of each party must be present when votes are being counted. In Democratic strongholds in Philly and Pittsburgh, Republican poll watchers were harrassed and locked out while they counted 400K votes for Biden. The Trump administration is suing to have 650-800K ballots thrown out that were counted during this 24 hour lockout period.
Poll workers handling absentee ballots in Wisconsin received direction from election authorities to illegally alter ballots with missing information. The missing information makes these absentee ballots invalid. [National File]
Of course, the biggest legal violation was shutting down the count when, in fact, they were allowing time for fraudulent ballots to arrive. Here’s what George is accused of:
“Let me repeat. Fulton County elections officials told the media and our observers that they were shutting down the tabulation center at State Farm Arena at 10:30 p.m. on election night only to continue counting ballots in secret until 1:00 a.m.,” [without poll watchers] said Georgia’s GOP chief, David Shafer.
Hiring the Fox to Guard the Henhouse
Notorious Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar publicly thanked leftist George Soros-funded organizations VotingWorks and the Brennan Center for Justice for helping audit the state’s primaries and making sure there was no fraud.
Postdating ballots
Last week, I covered the undercover video by Project Veritas filming postal workers admitting that they were given permission to back date absentee ballots so they could be counted. One Pennsylvania County has accepted over 2,000 non-dated ballots and discovered 17,000 more a week after the election.
Absentee ballots are a real problem in Pennsylvania. As the Epoch Times reported,
More than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and another more than 80,000 have return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database. Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times.
There is no way these could have been sent out and returned.
Pingback: Forecast for a Joe Biden Presidency – Liberty Forecast Blog
Pingback: Erin Marie Olszewski – The Edward Snowden of U.S. Healthcare – Liberty Forecast Blog
Pingback: Erin Marie Olszewski – The Edward Snowden of U.S. Healthcare – All Top News Today