9/11: A Day that Shall Forever Live in Infamy.

On this very date in 2001, the United States suffered the largest and most devastating attack on its soil since Pearl Harbor, which launched the U.S. into World War II. Like the Pearl Harbor bombing date, as then U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt declared, September 11, 2001 shall also “forever live in infamy”, especially in the hearts of those who were alive and witnessed it. This author recalls his former stepfather sharply turning the car around while on the way to school and heading straight back home because of the attack. What makes the date profoundly infamous is that the official investigation conducted by the U.S. government makes very little to absolutely no sense, and the resulting loss of liberties following the crises is absolutely unjustified as well, and therefore must be reversed.

Let’s start with breaking down why the official narrative is complete hogwash.

-First of all, jet fuel cannot burn to a high enough temperature to burn the extremely thick steel structure of World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2, the two buildings that received the impact of the two jet collisions. This is simply in violation of the laws of physics!

Both high rise towers 1 and 2 were designed to withstand a collision and subsequent fire from an airliner, and no steel framed structure has ever collapsed from fire, either before or after 9/11. Indeed, both WTC 1 and 2 did survive the crash and the fires were small and subsiding when the collapse began. The demolition of WTC buildings 1 and 2, hit by airplanes, was done by a sophisticated form of sequentially controlled demolition to collapse each floor below before it would stop or slow down the rubble from above. This automatic collapse caused the lower portions of the building to fail sequentially and look like the top portion was crushing the lower part.

Physically, it is impossible for the top portion to crush the entire bottom portion. As scientists from Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth have pointed out, even if every piece of falling building had impacted on the building below, the laws of physics show that at most an equal portion of the collapsing top and the resisting bottom portion of the building should have been destroyed and then the energy of the falling top would be used up (all crushed) and the collapse of the remaining bottom portion should have stopped.

-In further defiance of the laws of physics, a lateral jet plane crash into the middle to upper parts of World Trade Center(WTC) Buildings 1 and 2, would most definitely NOT be enough to cause the two buildings to collapse in the approximately 30 seconds it took for the entire buildings to finish collapsing. Especially the way it happened, for there to be an explosion on almost every floor, would require something far more than a side-on collision by a jet. In the video recordings of the event, we see the tilt gets to about 20 degrees and suddenly it stops tilting and starts falling straight down. This proves that the resistance from the bottom part of the building had been completely removed . All of this was accomplished using explosives set every few floors, triggered sequentially to match the speed of the fall as it is descending. Not only does this primary part of the narrative also grossly defy the laws of physics, it has lead to credible theories that there were bombs planted in the buildings ahead of time – the only plausible way for explosions to occur on several floors leading up to the completion of the demolition. Former janitor William Rodriquez reported hearing an explosion in the basement prior to the plane striking the buildings. If anything, side-on collisions with jet planes wouldn’t cause the buildings to completely collapse – it would only cause partial, but tragic, damage without fully bringing the two building all the way down to the ground, or even close.

-Let’s now turn to the plane crash into the Pentagon building, which also occurred on that fateful day. First of all, at such a low altitude and simultaneously a high velocity, the plane would start burning and sustaining structural damage. Additionally, by doing a search on YouTube, there isn’t terribly clear video footage of the supposed jet’s trajectory leading to its eventual collision into the Pentagon. How could this be for one of the most secure buildings in the U.S. that operates on a trillion dollar annual budget, to not have better security footage? As Joel Skousen explains here in the September 15th, 2017 edition of the World Affair Brief, which is a recommended source on this blog,  “All private security camera footage of the Pentagon attack were confiscated within minutes and the Pentagon parking lot video was edited before being leaked”. Furthermore, why wasn’t the trillion-dollar taxpayer funded U.S. domestic defense system unable to detect the incoming jet projectile and thwart it with any counter missiles before the collision? Perhaps most importantly, why has the beloved, responsible, oh so caring U.S. government never done a legitimate investigation and come up with good, credible answers to these questions?! Perhaps the most damning thing about the official story regarding the Pentagon is the accidental slip of the tongue by 9/11 commissioner Tim Roehmer stating that a missile pried open the fortress – meaning Pentagon. To the FBI and CIA, why hasn’t Roehmer been interrogated about this by your offices?! Joel Skousen also offers this powerful commentary regarding the attack on the Pentagon:

There are two crucial pieces of evidence that prove that a specially modified airliner did hit the Pentagon that day, and that it wasn’t the only thing to impact. I’m convinced a missile was fired by that remote controlled airliner. That had to be government. Terrorists couldn’t have done this modification on an airliner in service.

As a former fighter pilot I’ve seen lots of missile shoots from aircraft and the “swooshing” white trail you see from under the approaching aircraft on the Pentagon parking lot video is clearly a missile trail. The bright white explosive signature you see as the plane first hits the Pentagon is also proof that high explosives were involved in the initial contact with the wall. As for the crash itself, plane crashes only exhibit black smoke and red flames, and the black and red that follows the white flash indicate this plane didn’t have much fuel left in it—as the real flight 77 would have. Military men with combat experience testified upon coming out of the building nearby that they smelled the unmistakable smell of cordite—military grade explosives.

But the biggest proof of a missile strike is the big round hole that penetrated 3 rings of the Pentagon—that’s the equivalent of something solid going through 3 separate buildings. An aluminum aircraft couldn’t have done that, as one key witness explains shortly.

An additional proof that it had to be a missile is found in one special piece of debris from the aircraft crash found deep inside the Pentagon—a very large section of the radome (which is made of fiberglass and forms the nose of the airplane). Had the newly rebuilt and reinforced Pentagon wall been intact when that nose hit it at 500 mph, the radome would have been smashed to smithereens. The only way half a radome could have ended up inside is if there was already a hole in that building—the same large hole we see blasted through each of the 3 rings—that’s six exterior walls and the hole is still round and some 12 feet across. No airplane nor part of a plane can account for that. Even a normal explosive missile warhead couldn’t have done that (although it would have done more damage to the front wall). But a missile with a penetrating warhead could explain the damage.

Here’s the witness statement of Vin Narayanan who was sitting in traffic adjacent to the Pentagon when the plane flew overhead. He said “the tail of the plane clipped the overhanging exit sign above me as it headed straight at the Pentagon. The windows were dark on American Airlines Flight 77 as it streaked toward its target, only 50 yards away. The hijacked jet slammed into the Pentagon at a ferocious speed. But the Pentagon’s wall held up like a champ. It barely budged as the nose of the plane curled upwards and crumpled before exploding into a massive fireball.”

For him to say, “the wall held up like a champ” it had to mean that the explosion didn’t take place immediately. Remember that the Pentagon video above is a cut and edited version, not an actual presentation of exactly what happened. The fact that he could see it “crumple up” against the wall proves some small time lapse, which isn’t present in the edited Pentagon video. It is possible that the white flash of high explosive is not, in fact, the signature of the missile (which might have been edited out, or not visible in the case of a depleted Uranium non-explosive warhead). That white signature may have been the explosives going off inside all parts of the plane which turned the aircraft into confetti sized pieces, that were seen littering the parking lot.

Yes, a plane did hit the Pentagon, but it was blown to bits by explosives. It couldn’t have been a terrorist bomb in the baggage hold as that would have left major parts of the wing and fuselage visible. Only a plane fully loaded with explosives distributed all around, including the massive wings with their huge spars could account for the tiny pieces everywhere. I think the reason for the explosives was to destroy the evidence so the plane wouldn’t be traced.

What about the government’s claim to having traced the DNA of some passengers on Flight 77 to the Pentagon? I think, like other aspects of this crime, that evidence was planted. How do you know there’s a DNA match for survivors without an original sample? How were those samples collected by government?

-World Trade Center Building 7, the third and final building in New York City to collapse on that fateful day, is also incredibly suspicious, to say the very least. How could a building collapse on its own without any cause, such as jet planes colliding with it, as in the case of WTC buildings 1 and 2? Furthermore, the BBC reported Building 7 as collapsed before it happened – look here as Building 7 is still visible in the background as the reporter is reporting on the collapse BEFORE it happened. Did the BBC, along with other powerful and well-connected individuals, know this was going to happen before it actually happened? –> More on that later.

The fourth and final piece of the 9/11 Tragedy is the tragic fate of United Flight 93, which crash-landed into the ground, killing all passengers. Once again, Joel Skousen offers an excellent take on what really happened regarding United Flight 93 – the following excerpt is also taken from the September 15th, 2017 edition of Skousen’s World Affairs Brief analysis:

FAA records also show that all four of the United Airline aircraft were still flying in the airline system two years afterward, proving that they weren’t destroyed in the 9/11 attacks. Of course the debunkers say this was simply a clerical error, but there is other evidence. Greg Szymanski wrote that “FAA records for four years listed both 9/11 United jetliners as still on the ‘active’ list. Now the planes were only ‘deregistered’ in September (2004) after snoopy researchers questioned FAA officials a month earlier. Two of the 9/11 airliners were never ‘deregistered’ and remained on the ‘active’ flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.”

Need more proof? Pilots for 9/11 Truth found that Flight 11 was still broadcasting its “Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) data to ground stations in Pennsylvania after it was supposed to have struck the North Tower. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier?” Read the entire article here:

Clearly, with the official narrative making no sense or accordance with the laws of physics, the U.S. government’s investigation was a sham and a cover-up. Skousen’s analysis continues as follows:

The Airplanes and Hijackers: As has been widely reported, six of the “hijackers” were still alive after 9/11. To excuse this embarrassing error, the FBI came out and admitted that some ID’s may have been stolen, but in order not to discredit the “official version” the government has never removed their names and pictures from the official lists.

The U.S. government refused to allow the surveillance footage of passengers boarding the planes to be released to the public. Why Not?! Doesn’t the taxpaying public deserve to see all available footage of passengers in order to identify the hijackers? Does this not constitute obstruction of justice?! The government must clearly be hiding the identity of the real hijackers, trained to fly big jets (if they were ever present at all—which became a question later).

As criticism mounted, the FBI produced a video of Mohammed Atta going through security gates, hoping the public would now accept the official list. But it was quickly pointed out by critics that this particular video was a smooth continuous video—unlike real surveillance footage which takes photos every other second or so. More importantly, all official surveillance footage has a rolling date/time stamp visible, and this had none. It had clearly been faked.

So you see, when ordinary citizens commit obstruction of justice, they go to jail and get all kinds of media attacks, & rightfully so. But when the FBI commits obstruction of justice, such as in the highest order in the 9/11 investigation, they get away with the crime scot-free and continue to eat off of the hapless taxpayers. No wonder the FBI botched what should’ve been an easy and clear-cut prosecution and eventual indictment of Hillary Clinton for illegally running a private email server while serving as Secretary of State under former U.S. President Barack Obama.

Skousen also does an excellent job covering the controlled aircrafts – see below:

The Aircraft Swaps: We have powerful evidence that all of the airliners that crashed into the WTC and Pentagon were specially modified Boeing aircraft being remote controlled, and not the actual airliners pertaining to the hijacked flights as stated in the official story:

1) Aircraft radar tracks show all the “hijacked” aircraft exceeding the speed limitations for those Boeing aircraft by over 100 mph—at low altitude where the air resistance is very high—which almost always ends up in the aircraft being damaged or losing wings or tail surfaces. It is documented by Boeing flight tests that the aircraft become uncontrollable and unstable at speeds even mildly exceeding max operating speed (VMO), let alone at hundreds of mph over VMO.

2) The engine parts to the single engine found within the Pentagon crash debris belonged to a 747 engine, and do not correspond to the less powerful 767 engines, which may explain why it could do such a high speed turn exceeding the airplanes’ G limit and achieve a speed of over 500 mph. In fact, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) which is normally a stickler for matching all crash part serial numbers with the aircraft logs failed to require any part match up for the 9/11 investigation. Obviously, someone in government didn’t want any evidence that the aircraft that crashed don’t match the aircraft with passengers on that day.

3) FAA records also show that all four of the United Airline aircraft were still flying in the airline system two years afterward, proving that they weren’t destroyed in the 9/11 attacks. Of course the debunkers say this was simply a clerical error, but there is other evidence. Greg Szymanski wrote that “FAA records for four years listed both 9/11 United jetliners as still on the ‘active’ list. Now the planes were only ‘deregistered’ in September (2004) after snoopy researchers questioned FAA officials a month earlier. Two of the 9/11 airliners were never ‘deregistered’ and remained on the ‘active’ flight list until Sept. 28. 2005, the classification officially changing only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), inquiring about the strange irregularity.”

Need more proof? Pilots for 9/11 Truth found that Flight 11 was still broadcasting its “Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) data to ground stations in Pennsylvania after it was supposed to have struck the North Tower. How can messages be routed through such remote locations if the aircraft was in NY, not to mention how can messages be routed to an aircraft which allegedly crashed 20 minutes earlier?” Read the entire article here:

4) The 767 aircraft that flew into the South Tower (second WTC attack) had a very visible bulging modification on the fuselage under and behind the wing. That couldn’t have been flight 175 because the pilot must do a walk around and inspect the aircraft prior to flight and no pilot would have not seen and questioned this massive modification to his aircraft. The debunkers claim that this is the landing gear bulge but it is not. It’s much larger than that and only on one side. I called Boeing to ask who did the modification, knowing as I did that all “major modifications” have to be approved by the manufacturer, even for government. Without denying that there was an odd bulge on the aircraft, the spokesperson told me, “it wasn’t us.”

5) The aircraft that hit the Pentagon has a missile under the wing, which creates the smoke trail on the Pentagon Video just before it crashes. This blast creates the bright white signature of high explosives that you also see on the video, and creates the deep hole through 3 rings of this newly reinforced building. The aircraft is also loaded with so many explosives throughout that it blows the aircraft into tiny pieces, creating the illusion for many that “no airplane hit the Pentagon,” which isn’t true. Terrorist couldn’t have done that to a civilian airliner.

When you combine with the research of Pilots For 911 Truth who uncovered how some of the radar tracks show other radar blips merging with these flights, it explains how the real passenger planes could have been replaced with drone aircraft that did the actual attack.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth, have brought to light the case of the RADES radar tracks (from Hill AFB) which show where each airplane involved in 9/11 is during the attack. In a couple of cases radar tracks show a deliberate rendezvous with another aircraft in flight, coming from the West, whereupon one aircraft turns and assumes the other’s course heading back to the East Coast.

That’s an indication of a swap. Airliners cross paths with others all the time on the radar screen, but they almost never make a 180 degree circling turn at that very point and head off into a new direction. If it happened to only one aircraft, that would be one thing. But it happened to two of the supposed hijacked liners, and that indicates that there was coordination between other drone aircraft.

This “Aircraft Swap” theory which is gaining credibility since it alone explains why Flight 93’s supposed crash in rural Pennsylvania has almost no debris field (indicating no airline-size crash). Even though radar tracks don’t show swaps for Flight 175 and Flight 11, which hit the towers, they had to have occurred because the aircraft seen hitting the South Tower weren’t the ones that took off from Logan. Aircraft could still have rendezvoused with them at some point. Primary radar targets of aircraft with their transponders turned off don’t show up very well on controller’s scopes. The below testimony by the Senior Flight Attendant explains why Flight 11 couldn’t have hit the tower either and was flown off to a different destination.

Senior Flight Attendant analysis : Video of George Noory of Coast to Coast AM interviewing Rebecca Roth who reveals much about how those who were running this attack diverted the real aircraft to somewhere in Ohio (probably Cleveland, where there is a large NASA hangar to get the aircraft out of sight) and deployed other aircraft to take their place. Her book is Methodical Illusion. I think she really understands how this happened from a flight attendant point of view. I highly recommend listening to her testimony since she is the first one to explain what happened to the passengers and planes that were supposedly hijacked. Here are excerpts of the interview:

She first mentions something I had not been aware of: even though I knew the US military had perfected turning aircraft into drones, I did not know there is a software modification available for purchase by the airlines that can turn any Boeing aircraft into a remote controlled aircraft, using existing computer control of the autopilot. The program is called the Flight Termination Program—which allows the company to remotely take control of the aircraft from the pilot and land it safely somewhere, thus thwarting the hijacking. It’s pretty hard to find any mention of it on the net, but I found this at 21st Century Wire, about Boeing’s “uninterruptible Autopilot” system:

The Boeing 777 along with other Boeing models, can in fact be flown remotely through the use of independent embedded software and satellite communication. Once this advanced system is engaged, it can disallow any pilot or potential hijacker from controlling a plane, as the rooted setup uses digital signals that communicate with air traffic control, satellite links, as well as other government entities for the remainder of a flight’s journey.

She believes that there never was an actual hijacking, and that this program, initiated by government operators, remotely took control away from the pilots and landed it somewhere else. She also explained that the program takes control of the radios and can turn off the transponder, which would explain why ATC never got any hijack warning from the pilots and why the transponders were not showing the hijack code. As a pilot, I always wondered about that too. You can’t break into a cockpit so quickly that the pilots can’t get off some kind of verbal warning to ATC. Their transmitter switch is right on the control yoke.

This may seem a bit far fetched, but she has some very good reasons for thinking this way. First, she says that as a professional Flight Attendant and supervisor for 30 years, the supposed phone calls by the two Flight Attendants on Flight 11 (the first “hijacked” plane) had all the signs of being recorded on the ground. I noticed that too, that there was no aircraft noise in either recording.

She said their training is to delay, delay, delay the hijackers. Both flight attendants were on the phone for a total of 27 minutes talking—a violation of policy, and would have been noticed by the hijackers. If it were a real hijacking, that’s the last thing one would be doing, let alone two attendants, she said. Neither flight attendant said how the hijackers got into the cockpit, which was strange. She also confirmed that cellphones don’t work at those altitudes and that Airphones were horrible—they could only use two at the same time, maybe—and those would not likely have been able to stay connected for a long time.

She said that the claims of the two flight attendants were contradictory and didn’t match what would really happen on an airliner. One attendant said, “He had sprayed pepper spray in business class and we can’t breathe up there.” But her voice showed no signs of coughing and the pepper spray would have quickly spread throughout the cabin. Everyone would be feeling the effects. It could not have been contained in business class—unless they weren’t flying and this was all scripted on the ground once the plane landed at its secret location.

She added that the other attendant’s call said the hijacker “stood upstairs,” but there are no stairs on a 767—only a 747. So Roth suspects she was recording this in a hangar, which had an upstairs mezzanine floor, as many do.

To explain these anomalies, Roth hypothesizes that all four aircraft were taken to the same location, and that there was a government official on board “handling” them. She presents a very reasonable scenario that explains how the crew could have been talked into going along with all this, once the plane had been taken over by the Flight Termination program.

She thinks the government handlers had credentials and told the crew that it was part of the war game drill. And there were many separate war games going on that day. And, as part of this drill, certain passengers and flight attendants would be chosen to act out and record scripted scenarios, including calling their relatives and telling them they were hijacked, or “storming the cockpit.”

This is plausible because none of those staged calls seemed to be under duress during their recording, and it was the voice of the real person. Telling the passengers and crew they are in a war drill does make a lot of sense to me, and clears up many of my prior questions about how the government could have faked all these cell phone calls. In fact, they weren’t faked, they were staged.

Here are some of the indications that the calls were staged. In one call the attendant says, “We are the first” to be hijacked. This is true, but how would she have known there were to be others? Perhaps the handler was explaining to them before the recording how this drill was going to play out and the attendant mistakenly mentions something out of sequence.

Roth says, “she kept saying, we’re up in the air,” but that would have been obvious to the supervisor on the ground if this were a real call. Why tell her we are up in the air, unless she’s not and being told to fake it? There were also contradictions with the call from one flight attendant, who was saying that the person in seat 9b had been stabbed and a medical doctor was attending to him. The other told the airline base that there were “no medical issues” on board.

But most telling is the fact that on each tape recording there are whispered hints at the end of the recording, barely audible. One says, “It’s a frame.” and on the other you hear, “good job, good job,” as if someone is coaching her.

One former Naval aviator pilot who was chosen to make a call to his mother, told her he was “being hijacked.” When she asks where, he responds, “I think we are over Ohio.” That might have been true if the planes were flown to the NASA hangar at Cleveland. As a pilot, he might very well have known the terrain. Then he is prompted to say that he thinks there are some guys who are going to take over the aircraft. But, this is NOT flight 93, so Roth thinks this may have been a canned scenario thought up by the handler that applied to more than one flight—but only used on Flight 93.

Flight 93: There is evidence for Roth’s idea of staged scenarios in Todd Beamer’s “let’s roll” cell phone call about taking over flight 93. First, the tape recording played for one or two family representatives doesn’t match the black box voice recorder the government says came out of that fake crash site in Pennsylvania. The voice recorder version has lots of violent sounds, including breaking glass, banging and clanging—as if Beamer and crew are breaking into the cockpit to take control, but there are no voices during the fight for control—none at all. Yet, on the government created tape they played for the relatives, there is plenty of yelling. Something doesn’t match here. In addition, the recovered data recorder (faked by government) shows the airplane inverted and coming in at a steep angle. No one could be standing and fighting in the cockpit under those conditions.

By the way, from prior Google earth photos of the Shanksville area, that big groove in the earth where Flight 93 supposedly crashed has been visible since 1996. The government claims the hard quarry ground swallowed up the entire aircraft, wings and fuselage, but that’s impossible. Parts would have been bouncing off in all directions.

So, what did happen to flight 93? Cleveland Center lost radio contact with the plane over Ohio, but a United Flight was able to see the aircraft and relay the one radio communication they assumed was from the plane where the hijackers talked to the passengers about a bomb being aboard, keying the transmit button instead of the intercom. However, anyone with an aircraft band transmitter could have made those calls on Cleveland Center’s frequency—so that isn’t conclusive that the transmission was from flight 93.

However, the United Flight did see an explosion on board, and one engine and some luggage were found miles from the Shanksville false crash site. That is the only confirmation we have consistent with evidence that two F-16s were vectored to intercept the flight and that they fired upon it. ATC controllers in New Hampshire have told others they vectored a pair of F-16s to Flight 93. The Nashua controller said that an F-16 fighter stayed in hot pursuit of the hijacked airliner until it crashed in Pennsylvania and made 360-degree turns to remain close. ”He must’ve seen the whole thing,” the employee said, not knowing about the shoot down. Witnesses on the ground saw a least one of the fighters in the sky near Flight 93, and one saw the missile attack.

Pieces of the wreckage, including suitcases and an engine, were found miles from the crash site—consistent with an at-altitude explosion rather than an explosion on impact with the ground. But the plane still couldn’t have crashed in Shanksville, due to the utter lack of wreckage, until the government trucked in some stuff. If it was damaged, it made it to an airport.

Incidentally, the smoke bomb they set off at Shanksville to make it look like a real crash consisted of one big round black plume floating upward. This is identical to an explosive cloud but not at all like a crash from an airliner full of fuel which burns for quite a while with a continual stream of black smoke. The government claimed to dig out of the ground half a dumpster full of wreckage but as with the Pentagon crash, they refused to match any parts with aircraft serial numbers—leading many to believe the wreckage that was retrieved was planted. They never did provide any serial numbers for the engine they said they found either, so we really don’t know if the plane lost an engine at the time the aircraft experienced some kind of explosion seen by witnesses.

Furthermore, Many High-Profile people knew about or suggested the onset of the attack. Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York City on that date, did. Warren Buffett told his employees at Berkshire Hathaway to not physically show up to the company’s now former office(s) in the WTC on that date; he had to have either known of the eventual attack or had enough suspicion. As the Project for the New American Century(PNAC) published approximately one year before 9/11, in order for the U.S. Government to dominate humanity and much of the world’s resources, what is needed is “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”, This was written in September 2000 when some of the higher profile members of PNAC at that time were George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld, who went on to be President, Vice-President, and Secretary of Defense respectively, during the 9/11 attacks. Furthermore, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld all engaged in reckless and destructive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, all of which are part of the agenda described in that PNAC publication. Folks, 9/11 was the 21st century Pearl Harbor false-flag attack. The CIA even warned the Bush administration about a month before the attack of Osama Bin Laden’s intention to strike the U.S.; Bin Laden was later blamed for the attack, which was used to illegitimately justify U.S. occupation of Afghanistan, yet another colossal waste of taxpayer money and human lives, both Middle Eastern and American. ALL lives matter, don’t they?

Skousen presents further evidence of a cover up by the U.S. Government:

Evidence of Government Cover-up: The evidence is massive, from the falsified data from black boxes to the staged passenger and crew cell phone calls. But even from what we can prove the government showed tremendous obstruction of standard justice investigative procedures.

1) The federal government ordered police to restrict access to the WTC collapse site—especially to investigators and photographers. It also ordered the immediate destruction of the evidence and had all steel cut up and sold as scrap with the stipulation that it be shipped outside the country. None of the scrap steel was to be left in the US for analysis. This was essential as the steel would have clearly shown evidence of the cutting charges used for demolition. Still some of the few pictures of the rubble do show signs of cutting charges. The molten steel at the bottom would have also shown the chemical traces of thermite burning charges.

2) Rescue workers confirmed seeing the FBI find and remove black box voice and data recorders from the WTC site, but the FBI claimed they were never found.

3) Fire fighters and all other first responders were threatened and told to keep quiet about anything they saw or observed—especially about hearing explosions prior to the collapse of the twin towers. Edited versions of non-controversial accounts were released only years later.

4) An FAA supervisor destroyed the taped recording of the ATC controllers retelling what they saw and heard. The FAA colluded with the FBI to produce selectively edited snips of FAA telephone conversations, which consisted of FAA superiors talking about the attack to justify the official version, while withholding all original recordings from public airing. FAA flight recordings with hijacked aircraft were also kept secret—only selected portions have been transcribed and published.

5) FBI agents arrived “within minutes” at the CITGO service station across from the Pentagon to confiscate the station’s surveillance video of the crash. How did they know so soon about this video if there was no government foreknowledge of the attack or plans for a cover-up? The Sheraton Hotel camera tape and Virginia DOT tapes were all confiscated by the FBI as well.

6) NTSB never recorded nor cross checked any serial numbers from recovered aircraft parts as is standard procedure in any accident investigation.

7) President Bush and VP Cheney personally called Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle urging him not to conduct an investigation. Then, when pressured, they started playing with the terror alert warnings, raising them for any false threat they could concoct. Later, Bush relied on “Executive Privilege” to deny commissioners access to crucial documents, and required that the White House control what was kept secret.

8) The 9/11 Commission was rigged. After the initial controversy of trying to appoint insider-in-chief Henry Kissinger as chair of the panel, Bush opted for a reliable yes-man, Gov. Kean, and other former elected officials who wouldn’t cause waves when the cover-up became evident. The commission was plagued by the apparent conflicts of interest and excessive former relationships with government of the commissioners, who should have been probed more completely. Bush chose as chief counsel for the Commission another artful dodger/lawyer, Richard Ben Veniste—who treated all government witnesses as celebrities. Philip Zelikow, a former adviser to the pre-9/11 Bush administration, chose which evidence and witnesses to bring to their attention in a blatant conflict of interest.

Commission report flaws: Huge portions of the report were classified, including the whole chapter on Saudi Arabia involvement. The report disavowed and misrepresented the entire Able Danger testimony about the secret government data mining operation that had identified and tracked several of the alleged hijackers prior to 9/11. It evaded any interviews, discussions or investigations of issues like the molten steel in the basement, plane modifications, and the government’s refusal to turn over the Pentagon videos. The commission falsified the time Dick Cheney entered the command bunker in the basement of the White House to take charge, as if he came after the Pentagon Crash. In fact, he was there to direct that no planes intercept this attacking aircraft. They deleted Transportation Secretary Leon Mineta’s testimony of Dick Cheney refusing to rescind the order to NOT shoot down the approaching aircraft. The White house had armed anti-aircraft missiles on the roof and the Secret Service was ordered not to shoot. It’s like the charges of government conspiracy didn’t exist.

Can this big a conspiracy be kept a secret? That’s the big argument the debunkers pose. I say, yes it can. As an example, there are about 10- 18,000 civilian and military workers that travel out to Area 51 in Nevada each day, and this has been going on since the end of WWII with ever increasing manpower. None have ever broken their vow of secrecy. It is highly unlikely that the morally compromised small teams of dark side workers who set the charges in the World Trade Center will ever become whistle blowers, though one hopes at least one will talk someday. But let’s not be naive to think government can’t keep ugly secrets. They have to power to make good on powerful threats.

Why does all of this matter today? For one, the U.S. government should be more accountable to its citizens and refrain from such egregious dereliction of duty, especially when it forces the U.S. citizenry to pay income taxes. With a story provided by the U.S. government that is full of suspicion and void of truth and sense, that same government used the attack to further violate the liberties of hapless U.S. taxpayers. These liberties must be restored immediately. Then president George W. Bush created two new appalling departments – the Department of Homeland Security(DHS), and Transportation Security Administration(TSA), which continue to molest U.S. citizens today. Additional resulting laws, like the Patriot Act, have further violated the rights to privacy and the 4th Amendment. Furthermore, the unconstitutional and undeclared wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which also still go on today, are just as invalid, unnecessary, and despicable as they’ve wasted massive amounts of taxpayer money and lives, both Middle Eastern and American. ALL lives matter, don’t they?

No legitimate investigation has since been done by the U.S. government, nearly 20 years later. Nobody, most especially the military personnel responsible for defending U.S. soil, was fired or imprisoned for negligence, as they should be. Nobody tasked with the essential duty of defending U.S. soil was even publicly reprimanded for a lack of vigilance which resulted in thousands of deaths. If your hired security guards fail to thwart a burglar, wouldn’t you reprimand, and then likely fire those careless guards? No such punishment was given to any personnel tasked with the duty of defending domestic soil from those sorts of attacks.

The U.S. Government, like nearly all governments around the world, uses these crises to further abuse its powers to violate the liberty of the U.S. citizenry. The U.S. Government preys on the ignorance and weakness of the people to not understand the ugly truth about the U.S. government’s irresponsible investigation and response, and thereby gets away with violating its constitutional restrictions, to which thousands had to die to achieve for the benefit of posterity, scot-free to this day. It is this author’s grand fear that the U.S. Government will continue to get away with these immense crimes against humanity, such as using a phony pandemic like COVID-19 to drastically and unconstitutionally trample on fundamental individual liberties. Just like Pearl Harbor, the U.S. Government used 9/11 to try to justify unconstitutional foreign military occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan, to molest Americans at airports via the TSA, as well as to illegally and unethically spy on the private affairs of Americans through the USA Patriot Act – all of which continue to this day, nearly 20 years later.

If the U.S. Government got away with Pearl Harbor, 9/11, and COVID-19, then there isn’t any reason to believe that it won’t get away with its upcoming planned false flag attack on U.S. soil to launch the hapless U.S. taxpaying citizenry into World War III.

Therefore, as at least some steps to correct the wrongful actions, the sins, committed by the U.S. government following the 9/11 attacks, this author advocates for the following:

-The abolition of both the TSA and DHS. Neither of these departments should have ever been legislated into existence.

-The repeal of the USA Patriot Act. This law fails to satisfy the sole purpose of the law – protect liberty at all costs.

-The total withdrawal of all U.S. soldiers from both Afghanistan and Iraq. Not a single soldier should be stationed in either of those countries. This also means shutting down all U.S. military bases in those two countries – there is no reason for them to exist there as they are nothing more than wasteful uses of U.S. taxpayer funds.

-A public and formal prosecution of former President George W. Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and all military personnel active on September 11, 2001 whose duty was to protect the U.S. against domestic attacks.

-The abolition of the Federal Bureau of Investigation(FBI). It is tasked to go after and punish injustice, but when it commits obstruction of justice and let’s politically well-connected insiders commit felonies(Hillary Clinton), then it is no longer a friend to liberty or U.S. Citizens. It is a sham and waste of U.S. taxpayer money, as well as a domestic threat. This means the FBI has to go, permanently.

-The abolition of the Central Intelligence Agency(CIA). For similar reasons to the FBI described above, the CIA does NOT protect U.S. citizens or liberty. In fact, like the FBI, it violates liberties and threatens U.S. citizens. Not to mention it has committed appalling crimes against humanity like intentionally infecting the citizens of Guatemala with Syphilis. Still, not even the smallest punishment has been levied against this criminal agency. Let’s give the CIA the punishment it deserves – abolition.

Some other time, when you are refreshed, this author recommends you sit down and watch the 5 hour documentary film on 911- A New Pearl Harbor by the Italian director Massimo Mazucco. Composed of two other parts, here they are in order: here and here. It doesn’t cover some of the unique details presented above, but he does give you the best overview of the entire conspiracy and takes on the insidious debunkers of 9/11 conspiracy facts head on. Highly recommended.

Comments are closed.