9/11 Still Unanswered Questions – Will This Change?

The following is the conclusion to my other post on the 20th anniversary of the horrific September 11th attacks on the U.S. in 2001. This post below is just my forecasts on which of the still unanswered questions might get answered, to what extent the answers will be, and why.

Will We Ever Get Answers?

At this point, 20 years later, the full truth has still not been released by any official or authoritative source, such as the FBI. The arguments, such as those in Mazzucco’s film, disproving the possibility of the 9/11 Commission Report and official narratives have not been effectively refuted. With so many years gone by, one thing many are wondering, and rightfully so, is “Will anyone involved in the cover-up ever speak up?”. This section will make a forecast about that. In order of highest to lowest probability, I’ll explain what has a chance of ever being revealed and known to the public.

The 85 private video tapes confiscated by the FBI of the plane crash into the Pentagon. At some point, I think the FBI will release some of those 85 types. I certainly don’t expect all of them to be released, and I think only a small fraction of them will ever be released. That being said, it doesn’t seem likely that whatever tapes are released WON’T be edited in some way. After all, if the one and only publicly available security footage from the Pentagon building itself was photoshopped, it certainly stands to reason that the eventually additionally released tape(s) will be edited in some way to not reveal too much, but enough to potentially appease those demanding the truth. In similar fashion, I predict that the released tapes will selectively edit and remove anything resembling the missile on the jet. The FBI will use the doctored tape(s) to say something like “see, there is no cover-up or conspiracy, we’re revealing the tapes now, now that we deem national security isn’t threatened by its release; you see, here you go”

Douglas Cochrane’s interview by the 9/11 Commission. Just like the video tapes, and even the alleged cell phone recordings from United 93, the public will eventually be allowed to access this secret interview. However, much like the only available video recording of the plane crash into the Pentagon, this release will be edited in some way. In fact, I think any part indicating Cheney’s order to avoid shooting down the plane will be removed from the eventually released recording. Again, this will be enough, at least from the point of view of the U.S. government, to appease those demanding the truth and revelation of all critical information, like Cochrane’s still covered-up interview. It’ll be enough for the U.S. government to say something like “see, there is no cover-up, we’re releasing the interview to you now, now that we deem national security isn’t threatened by its release, you see, here you go”. One might wonder if Cochrane himself will ever speak up; the answer is no. It would be in Cochrane’s best interest of self-preservation to just let the U.S. Government release his interview when they deem fit, as it would deflect any risk, unwanted attention, and responsibility from Cochrane. Unlike E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed confession to his son of his participation, as a lower-level CIA agent in the assassination of then-president John F. Kennedy(JFK), Cochrane doesn’t come off as shamelessly proud of his involvement in the cover-up and conspiracy, unlike Hunt, whose son admitted that E. Howard Hunt was proud of his participation in JFK’s murder.

Any more of the subpoenaed audio recordings between United 93’s pilot & ATC. This will certainly not happen because one recording was already leaked, without the permission of the FAA. Already, as explained above, the recording contains damning details of a bomb onboard United 93, and so the FAA, and the other parties involved in the orchestration of all the 9/11 events, would have nothing to gain from releasing any more recordings, and would therefore have no desire to release any further recordings, and therefore will never release any more of these recordings.

Whistleblowers on those who knew about the explosives planted in the WTC Twin Towers. This is not too likely, and I forecast that nobody will ever reveal and confirm the planting of the explosives inside the two buildings. Despite all the arguments presented by Mazzucco, myself, A&E911 and many, many others, nobody will ever be able to show physical proof, such as images or video recordings, of the installation of the bombs inside the buildings. Even if those who planted the bombs, or organized the planting of bombs, come clean about it, they won’t be able to show conclusive and/or physical evidence. There will be no physical proof to back up their revelatory and truthful words. Without such evidence, the whistleblower(s) wouldn’t come off as credible, and would likely be ridiculed, at the very least; as such, knowing whistleblowers would have very little to no incentive to reveal the truth. Therefore, I don’t expect any such whistleblowers who know the truth to ever reveal the truth of this matter.

Whistleblowers on those who knew about the missile that hit the Pentagon, This will also not happen, and I forecast that nobody will ever reveal and confirm the missile on that plane. Just like I predict the FBI’s release of confiscated video tapes won’t reveal the missile on the jet, no whistleblower will ever be allowed to show any physical evidence of the missile. For anyone to have the courage, let alone the conscience, to reveal the truth, that person would need to have some physical evidence showing the presence of the missile prior to impact. There will be no physical proof to back up their revelatory and truthful words. Without such evidence, the whistleblower wouldn’t come off as credible, and would likely be ridiculed, at the very least; as such, knowing whistleblowers would have very little to no incentive to reveal the truth. Therefore, I don’t expect any such whistleblowers who know the truth to ever reveal the truth of this matter.

Whistleblowers on those who knew about the remote controlled drone aircrafts. For similar reasons stated regarding the missile which hit the Pentagon, this too will never be revealed. Just like I predict the FBI’s release of confiscated video tapes won’t reveal the missile on the jet, no whistleblower will ever be allowed to show any physical evidence of remote controlled drone aircrafts which hit the Pentagon and the two WTC towers. For anyone to have the courage, let alone the conscience, to reveal the truth, that person would need to have some physical evidence, which might not even be possible to produce, even for any potential whistleblowers with a conscience or the right amount of courage. There will be no physical proof to back up their revelatory and truthful words. Without such evidence, the whistleblower wouldn’t come off as credible, and would likely be ridiculed, at the very least; as such, knowing whistleblowers would have very little to no incentive to reveal the truth. Therefore, I don’t expect any such whistleblowers who know the truth to ever reveal the truth of this matter.

Whistleblowers on those who know where American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77, and United Airlines Flight 175 truly landed. Along with United 93, these are the other three airplanes that got hijacked on 9/11. Unfortunately, no records, analysis, or observations regarding the locations of these other flights has ever come to light, at least nowhere close to the level pertaining to the case of where United 93 truly ended up on September 11th, 2001. The other three jets could’ve been landed anywhere remote and out of sight, to which there are so many possibilities. Perhaps, like United 93, the other three flights were forced to go into other hangars. This is all speculation, and forever will be, because, as I forecast, no knowing whistleblowers will ever reveal the true location of where the other three jets landed. Not only do such whistleblowers with enough of a conscience or courage not exist, it also wouldn’t be easy enough to show proof of where those other three jets landed.

Whistleblowers on those who know the true identity of the hijackers. There is no way this will ever happen. It’s already too embarrassing for the 9/11 Commission, the FBI, and other relevant departments of the U.S. government to deal with the fact that some of those alleged hijackers actually lived beyond September 11, 2001. Revealing the identities of the true hijackers would be too damning, embarrassing, and incriminating for the U.S. government departments and officials involved; this will therefore be prevented and avoided under all circumstances. Therefore, the public will never learn the truth of this matter, or so I forecast.

Edward Felt’s Alleged Cell Phone Call Recoding. This I forecast will never happen. From the already suspicious recording of CeeCee Lyles’ alleged cell phone call recording, the U.S. Government and the 9/11 Commission will not want to risk hurting their credibility even further with the public.

Whistleblowers on those who knew what happened inside NASA Glenn Hangar, This too will not happen, and I forecast that none of the perpetrators and/or handlers, the only ones who know what truly happened inside, of the sequestered jets and passengers will ever reveal and confirm what truly happened inside NASA Glenn Hangar. NASA has already stated, through Bill Wessel, that a KC-135 jet, and not United 93, was taken into that hangar on that day. For any of the perpetrators to come clean, they not only would need to have the conscience to do so, but also an immense amount of courage and proof of the events that took place on the inside; without the latter, the perpetrators would lack credibility and get ridiculed, in addition to getting incriminated. The perpetrators and handlers are under too much pressure, and probably threats and some kind of blackmail too, to forever withhold their knowledge of the events that unfolded inside.

Joe Biden’s release of additional documents pertaining to 9/11. At the time of this writing, Joe Biden has the powers of the U.S. President and occupancy of the Oval Office, despite stealing the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. On September 3, 2021, eight days before the 20th anniversary of 9/11, Biden ordered the release of some documents pertaining to 9/11. These documents are believed to reveal the role of some high-profile Saudi Arabian individuals and associations in the 9/11 attacks. It’s too hard to say if Biden will indeed follow through and release these documents by the 20th anniversary of 9/11. It’s also too hard to say how much truth these documents will reveal, if any. Only time will tell.

Among the two points above on which I expect to become more revealed, the still hidden privately filmed video tapes at the Pentagon and Douglas Cochrane’s interview with the 9/11 Commission, the timing is a much more difficult aspect to forecast. I don’t expect any of these revelations to come before the passing of several more years, decades even, from the time of this writing. Regarding Cochrane’s interview, I would expect the release timing to come some time after Cochrane’s time on Earth comes to an end. This would be the least worrisome release option from the perspective of the U.S. government; with Cochrane unable to add any further commentary, let alone dispute the veracity or reveal the alteration of the released interview, the U.S. government wouldn’t have to worry about the only one who would definitely know anything about the editing and/or doctoring of the released interview; Douglas Cochrane himself.

Of course, all the answers pertaining to the above described points should be released, but even one revelation of any of the above discussed points would be better than absolutely nothing, which isn’t far from what U.S. citizens, and citizens across the world too, have received thus far from the U.S. Government and the 9/11 Commission.

Comments are closed.