Like the United States in 2020, Brazil’s 2022 Presidential Election was fraudulent. Another similarity is that the incumbent, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, was cheated out of an election victory against globalist puppet Lula Da Silva, who was arrested for corruption charges, which actually banned him from running in the prior election in 2018. The third and probably most significant similarity is that like Donald Trump in the United States, Bolsonaro was not part of the globalist cabal that is trying to establish a One World Government, a.k.a. the New World Order, bringing about the death of both national sovereignty and civilization.
While Bolsonaro has fled Brazil and is a wanted fugitive under the vengeful, evil, and ever corrupt Lula regime, which officially took office on January 1, 2023, the media in Brazil is spinning a false narrative to frame Bolsonaro supporters as insurrectionists, much like the mainstream media in the United States(U.S). did to Trump supporters during the January 6th fiasco.
First off, Brazilians are protesting the election results, and the protests have now extended into people entering the Brazilian Capitol building, very much like January 6th in the U.S., where many Americans did enter the U.S. Capitol building.
The other key similarity between both events is the astonishing lack of police protection at both Capitol buildings, thereby indicating, if not totally proving, that the prevailing regimes in both countries purposefully allowed the protestors to enter the building, in order to entrap them and portray them as violent, radical insurrectionists who deserve to be jailed in Gulag-style prisons. Furthermore, Bolsonaro himself is not endorsing or calling for people to enter the capitol building, so clearly there are bad actors, saboteurs, and other agent provocateurs, similar to the January 6th disaster in the U.S. As shown in this video, only a small number of police and security forces were present at the Capitol building, with no apparent explanation. Clearly, the Brazilian government could’ve authorized and sent out more police forces to protect the Capitol building and keep the protest from getting out of control, but didn’t, why? Probably because the Brazilian government wanted the protestors to enter the building in order to entrap them and then portray them as insurrectionists to the public, albeit falsely, to which the public fails to realize the deception. Furthermore, Bolsonaro’s physical absence from the Capitol premises shows that Lula’s regime clearly has dominant control and the upper hand in Brazil, further favoring the explanation that Lula’s regime is purposefully allowing people to enter the Capitol building, unless it is negligence on the part of Lula’s regime, to which no one has proven to be the more likely explanation. Similar to January 6th, Trump also didn’t enter the Capitol building or even set foot on its premises on that day.
Similar to January 6th, where we know, based on testimonies such as the one by Kash Patel, who served as chief of staff to the acting U.S. Secretary of Defense under Trump, to the Epoch Times, that the U.S. government purposefully refused to send and install more security forces, like the U.S. National Guard, to protect the Capitol building and prevent the crowd from getting out of control. Patel explained that he, on behalf of President Donald Trump, requested Nancy Pelosi, the acting Speaker of the House, to authorize the National Guard to protect the Capitol on January 6th, but Pelosi refused. Why would she do that? Probably because she, along with the rest of the Deep State, wanted to let the protestors enter the Capitol, in order to entrap them the way that the Brazilian seems to be doing. Until anyone offers are more plausible and provable explanation, this is the most likely case.
Now let’s analyze how the lack of security in both events in the U.S. and Brazil mirror the protest events in Ukraine in 2014 and the Soviet Union during the alleged, but phony and deceptive, collapse. In Ukraine in 2014, then President Victor Yanukovich was allegedly ousted; however, when the protestors arrived at the presidential building, Yanukovich had fled, and hardly any security guards were there. The presidential building in Kiev, Ukraine’s capital, was nearly unguarded, again like in Brazil and the U.S., with no apparent or acceptable explanation. Although hardly anyone asks why the palace in Ukraine was unguarded, it was also part of a deception; in the case of Ukraine, the deception was by Russian president Vladimir Putin to fool the world into thinking that Ukraine’s new president, Petro Poroshenko, was a pro-Western puppet, when in reality, like Yanukovich, Poroshenko was also a puppet of Putin.
In the case of the phony fall of the Soviet Union, similarly, the main administrative buildings and premises, like the Red Square in Moscow, were left unprotected by any military or security against unarmed protestors. Like in Ukraine, the Soviet Union leaders could’ve easily suppressed the protestors, but chose not to; this is because the Soviet Union purposefully faked their demise. Today, the communist oligarchs who were more prominent during the Cold War still rule the “former” Soviet states, just in the shadows, similar to how the U.S. Deep State operates. However, the Soviet Union needed to put on a facade and convince the world that it no longer was communist in order to procure aid and trade, especially of the military kind, from the West, as the West had a anti-communist doctrine and therefore couldn’t trade with communist nations. This is especially because the Soviet Union was far less efficient in building up its military, and so it therefore needed Western help. However, the West also has wanted to build up Russia as an enemy for the upcoming World War 3, which is why the West went along and allowed the Soviet Union to pull off its grand deception.
So that brings us to the forecast of this post, which will answer the big question relating to Brazil’s future in light of the ramifications of current events in the country; will the new, fraudulent, pro-communist, globalist regime use the current events in Brazil similar to how the Joe Biden administration has used January 6th? The answer and forecast is yes, but there will be some key differences in the details.
Certainly, like in the U.S., the Lula regime will portray and likely outright declare Bolsonaro supporters, and Bolsonaro himself, as traitors, violent insurrections, and/or similar ad hominems. Also, illegal and brutal arrests of Brazilians will take place, and they’ll also likely be placed in Gulag-style jails; if Lula’s regime is trying to incarcerate Bolsonaro, then the new regime will certainly not stop there and will surely go after Bolsonaro’s supporters too. Lastly, the Lula regime will then try to disarm all Brazilians, undoing perhaps the greatest part of Bolsonaro’s legacy, making it easier for Brazilians to own guns. In the total absence of anything close to the 2nd Amendment, this will be far easier in Brazil than in the U.S., making it the biggest difference between the horrific events and dark fates of both countries.
Let’s pray for this forecast to be totally wrong.
Corrections & Misses on January 9th, 2023
Lula is not a globalist puppet, but a full blown communist, like former Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. Lula hosted all the communist revolutionaries in a forum in Sao Paolo every year of his former presidency; this will continue with his new and fraudulent presidency.
Regarding the Ukraine 2014 Maidan coup, it was former president Yanukovich who gave orders to the Berkut, Ukraine’s special police forces, to stand down, which is how the protestors were able to move from the Maidan square into the also unguarded presidential palace.
Lastly, regarding January 6th, it was more than just a lack of police presence like in Brazil. While some police were at the U.S. Capitol, some of them were told by the Deep State to purposefully let protestors in, for the above-described purposes. In the tunnel part of the Capitol premises, one policeman was recorded saying “I don’t agree with this”, referring to letting the protestors enter. The similarity to Brazil is more the weak and nearly effortless response to the crowd, which is really just a sham show of force rather than any interest to prevent a Brazilian January 6th.